The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) says it is still considering whether or not to proceed with further work on a policy guarantee scheme after industry submissions were “universally against” while policyholder focus group views were mixed.

“We note that our focus group participants were more enthusiastic about the introduction of a scheme than the industry but that participants also had some reservations,” a feedback paper as part of a consultation on broader reforms says.

“If we did proceed further with the concept, it would require considerable additional analytical work and further consultation.”

Policyholder guarantee schemes are designed to cover some or all of a policyholder’s claims if their insurer fails, and most commonly are funded by charging insurers a levy.

RBNZ says designing a scheme is complex and it has not assessed the costs. At this stage it is looking only at whether the idea merits more research and consideration.

“We will be undertaking further analysis before making any decisions on this issue,” it says.

Industry submissions argue that a scheme should be unnecessary if other regulatory settings are correct, it would risk moral hazard, increase costs for policyholders in a market already showing signs of underinsurance and is an inefficient way or providing protection.

The RBNZ consultation looked at the information insurers are required to publish to help consumers assess their financial soundness, and therefore the risk of failure.

“Feedback from the consultation has confirmed our view that the financial information insurers are required to publish is broadly appropriate,” Deputy Governor Christian Hawkesby said.

“However, there is scope to think about ways of presenting this information in ways that make it easier for consumers to understand.”

The policyholder security consultation is part of a multi-stage review of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010.

RBNZ intends to publish in-principle policy decisions on all the issues raised for further feedback next year before moving on to legislative drafting and implementation.